Banking on bullshit: indifferences towards truth in corporate social responsibility

David M. Herold, Timo Dietrich, Tim Breitbarth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to identify and deconstruct bullshit in banks' corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication to advance the management rhetoric research space, which has been characterised by an indifference to truth and meaning. Design/methodology/approach: We provide a typology of bullshit phenomena overview in the banking sector and follow the McCarthy et al.'s (2020) C.R.A.P. framework from to showcase how bullshit can be comprehended, recognised, acted against and prevented. Findings: This paper puts a spotlight on written and spoken language to detect bullshit in banks' CSR statements. It provides actionable insights into how stakeholders can act against and prevent bullshit statements from occurring in the future. Research limitations/implications: Future research is warranted to assess the use of still imagery, events and video materials in corporate communications and non-financial reporting. Further rigorous assessment of actual CSR initiatives must be undertaken to assess claimed contributions. Practical implications: Monitoring mechanisms and independent assurance statements prepared by authorised third parties may strengthen the motivation and ethicality of CSR activities. Originality/value: This viewpoint is the first to follow the C.R.A.P framework and critically assess indifferences towards truth in banks' CSR communications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)618-637
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Bank Marketing
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Banking industry
  • Bullshit
  • Communication
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Rhetoric

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Banking on bullshit: indifferences towards truth in corporate social responsibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this